Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 10:59:41 GMT
The volumes means that it also associates the search intent. This is comprehensively disproven by this data. There is no significant difference between grouped and ungrouped keyword pairs when it comes to SERP similarity. The one group where there is a larger difference is the verb stems category. This is likely because there are many verbs where the present and past tense mean very different things indicating different search intent. For example the keywords march and marched have completely different intents due to the multiple meanings of the word march.
This means that theres no chance that these SERPs will be similar. On the other Greece Mobile Number List hand some verbs have little intent difference between past and present forms for example admire and admired. These types of keyword pairs generally have grouped volume and also have more similar SERPs. Overall there is not a very high rate of similarity of SERPs for similar keywords When starting this analysis I expected to see much higher rates of similarity between very similar keywords. This is not the case and to me that is surprising for two reasons. The first is that as mentioned above I saw the grouping of keyword volumes to be a clear signal that the keywords were seen as identical intents.
This appears not to be the case. faith in how smart Google is. Its developments in natural language processing and intent assessment give me the impression that it is able to associate similar keywords in the results it shows. It may be that things are heading in this direction but its too early for it to have been fully implemented. The alternative explanation would be Google is that smart and can interpret the subtle difference between keywords with incredibly similar content. What should we take away from this What does this mean for SEOs doing keyword research Rank tracking companies such as STAT are looking into ways of.
This means that theres no chance that these SERPs will be similar. On the other Greece Mobile Number List hand some verbs have little intent difference between past and present forms for example admire and admired. These types of keyword pairs generally have grouped volume and also have more similar SERPs. Overall there is not a very high rate of similarity of SERPs for similar keywords When starting this analysis I expected to see much higher rates of similarity between very similar keywords. This is not the case and to me that is surprising for two reasons. The first is that as mentioned above I saw the grouping of keyword volumes to be a clear signal that the keywords were seen as identical intents.
This appears not to be the case. faith in how smart Google is. Its developments in natural language processing and intent assessment give me the impression that it is able to associate similar keywords in the results it shows. It may be that things are heading in this direction but its too early for it to have been fully implemented. The alternative explanation would be Google is that smart and can interpret the subtle difference between keywords with incredibly similar content. What should we take away from this What does this mean for SEOs doing keyword research Rank tracking companies such as STAT are looking into ways of.